Saturday, 19 January 2013

Hello and Welcome!

Hey, how's it going. The name is Sam Thompson, and I'm a student at Walton High School, studying Media Studies at Sixth Form A level. That's probably the very reason you were able to find this blog in the first place, unless you were deliberately searching for it. Because, though I have zero previous experience with blogs, one requirement is that I need to create one and detail my progress and work for this subject within it.

So get ready for hearing a lot about Media Studies, and not much else. I'll also need to be more factual than fun with my posts, because, although I really want to, I don't think you get marks for adding humour in your work, no matter how good it is, so it may get a bit boring from here on out.

Either way, there will be two central topics that I will cover in this blog; one for each year of doing this course. This first topic will be a topic that, when I heard about it, I was really sensitive and scared about covering, but also interested personally in learning about.

This was very new territory for me, since I'm not good at digesting this kind of thing, particularly the more violent and especially graphic ones, and have very little previous experience with them. It was however territory I needed to enter to get a satisfiable grade so I thought, how bad can they be (Don't answer that by the way, cause I'd really rather not know), and sheepishly made my way into it.

Think of me as an explorer, and think of these posts as my documenting of my finds, as I spend time in this dangerous place. Some of it will be facts and research, other parts will be my own projects and my own experience with this topic, and other parts will be things such as movie trailers that may be familiar or unfamiliar. I hope by the end of this first topic I have done a significant amount of work to get a good understanding of this genre, and its place in the media, so welcome to my Media Studies blog, and the first topic I need to cover:

The Thriller Genre of Films:


Friday, 18 January 2013

An Initial Look Into the Thriller genre

Alright, so we begin. As I said before in my previous post I had very little previous knowledge of the Thriller genre, and since I didn't want to be unprepared before I started looking at some real thrillers and analysing them, I decided to research their basic outlines and the things in a Thriller film or TV series that made them Thrillers. Through looking on the internet at a couple of sources, and making brief notes of my own I came across a few key facts that I either copied or put into my own words on this post. For a source reference to the webpages I took the information and images from, look at the bottom of this post.


The Key Points of Thrillers - 



- They elicit the feelings of anticipation, tension and suspense, uncertainty, anxiety and terror, and surprise from the viewers, and then utilize those feelings to increase the effectiveness of the film

- The above emotions build throughout the storyline, leading to a immensely weighted climax as the emotion build up comes full circle

- The plot speed is fast-paced, and the story is rousing and adrenaline rushing

- 'Red herrings' (plot elements designed to mislead you), cliff hangers, and plot twists are commonplace in the plot line of Thrillers

- They're designed to keep the viewers on the edge of their seats, alert and expectant

- They emphasize danger, normally danger aimed at the main character (protagonist)

- Almost all Thrillers are R rated for their violence and unsuitability for young children


Thriller Sub Genres -

Action Thriller - Uses physical action to build up suspense. Normally has continuous motion, and utilizes fights, stunts, chases and other physical elements that also contribute to the build-up in suspense, and the sense of danger.

Examples - Die Hard, The Bourne Films

Crime Thriller - Incorporates aspects of crime into the plot, utilizing murders, thefts, or hunts, and focuses on both the protagonist and antagonist in detail, often giving the antagonist a lot of character depth.

Examples - Se7en, No Country for Old Men

Sci-Fi Thriller - Incorporates science based themes into the plot line, and utilizes advanced technology and fantasy objects. They're often set in the future, with unfamiliar locations and plot elements.

Examples - Inception, District 9

Psychological Thriller - In which there is a sense of mental or emotional conflict going on with the main characters. These often incorporate elements of mystery, and the threat coming from the mind rather than an external source. This genre often mixes into the horror genre of films.

Examples - Memento, Psycho

Political Thriller - Plot line has political elements to it, or elements of political importance. The plot normally has the main character trying to ensure the stability of his/her own government.

Examples - The Man Who Knew Too Much, The Interpreter

Religious Thriller - The film incorporates religious themes, or religious plot elements. These films often have some form of ethical issue going on as a plot element and sometimes have supernatural or spiritual threats like possession and exorcism.

Examples - The Da Vinci Code, The Exorcist

Conspiracy Thriller - Normally involves a conflict between a powerful enemy syndicate, and the main protagonist/s of the film. Often only the protagonist/s know the true extent, and have proper knowledge of the enemy organisation which puts pressure on him/her/them to stop them.

Examples - JFK, In the Line of Fire

Spy Thriller - Implements spy-work, and undercover elements, with the protagonist usually being a spy or government agent. Similar to conspiracy thrillers as the enemies are normally an enemy organisation opposing the main character, normally terrorists or a rival government and it's up to the character to defeat the group.

Examples - Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, The Tourist

Techno Thriller - This sub-genre revolves around suspense and strongly implements the use of advanced technology as plot elements, or sometimes even as the antagonist of the film. This type of film of fits in with the Action and Sci-fi sub-genres.

Examples - Eagle Eye, The Jurassic Park Films

Supernatural Thriller - Brings in otherworldly plot elements to the story, normally in the form of fantasy creatures, mythical creatures, or aliens. These films use uncertainty, tension, suspense and anxiety to full effect in the plot.

Examples - Alien, What Lies Beneath

Erotic Thriller - A type of thriller that implements eroticism, sexuality and sexual relationships as key plot elements. These elements are normally applied to the protagonist of the film and his/her relationships with other characters.

Examples - Lust, Basic Instinct




Wikipedia Article on the Thriller Genre


Thriller Genre Article from The Script Lab

Wikipedia Article on Film ratings

Thursday, 17 January 2013

Textual Analysis - Thriller Intros

Okay, so that's the basic overview of the genre out of the way. This next post, now that I have some understanding of what the genre's outline is, is finally going to take a look at some real thrillers, or more precisely, their openings. During my time studying this topic I've been shown six different Thriller films, each different from the next:

- Children of Men
- Taking Lives
- Cockneys vs Zombies
- Psycho
- No Country for Old Men
- Inception

Some of these films you've probably heard of, others less likely. I'll only be covering four of these films in this post, because Children of Men is somewhat hard to analyse, and the intro to Cockneys vs Zombies is not one that I wish to see again, because of how graphic it is. (Gore and mutilation have always been traumatising for me, and I really don't react well when I see it). I'll be analysing the various elements found in the openings, i.e. Sound, Characters, Feelings/Vibe, Editing and Camera use, and Mise-en-Scene (a media term used to group together five different things, lighting, costume, setting, dialogue, and performance). I'll also put film posters on so that you can better understand what I'm writing about, and of course the links to the where I found them can be found at the bottom of the post.

 

Taking Lives:

Genre: Crime/Psychological Thriller
Main Actors: Angelina Jolie & Ethan Hawke
Release Date: March 19 2004
Profit: £10,470,529
Description:
Based on a Thriller novel by Michael Pye, it follows an investigation by FBI detective Illeana Scott into tracking down and apprehending a dangerous serial killer who has remained concealed from police for 20 years. But as she becomes more involved with the case and starts developing feelings for one of the witnesses, she starts to realise that not everyone is as they seem to be.

Opening Analysis:


Considering that the film is a Thriller, it actually starts off in a somewhat cheerful manner. The film starts off at a bus station, with a young man, possibly still in his teens, buying a bus ticket. A caption in the first shot identifies the time and place - St. Jovite, Canada 1983. The non-diegetic soundtrack playing in the opening is uplifting, and melodious, creating a cheerful vibe.
The boy is not shown to be particularly unique, sporting long hair, wearing glasses, and having a certain shyness about his personality. No immediate implications of abnormality are shown in his character, although there is a faint trace of him not being completely ordinary.
The early shots in the opening are at odd angles, and have natural distortion to them, although the bright weather and sun make it near unnoticeable in some of the shots. Throughout the first scene the boy is shown to be distracted by what is going on and seems to have an interest in a boy about his own age, already sitting in the station and carrying a guitar.
The next scene is shown on the bus itself, and the boy is approached by the same young guy that he took notice of in the station, asking to sit with him. In this scene both of their names are revealed - The young man with the guitar is named Matt, whilst the boy shown at the start is called Martin. During the brief conversation that they have Matt is shown to be charismatic and good looking, and more talkative and confident than Martin does. Martin just seems to stare at Matt with a degree of interest in his facial features for the majority of the conversation.
When the bus breaks down the two of them leave and rent a car instead. Martin is shown to pay, using cash from a paper envelope, and has to drive since Matt doesn't have a license. He doesn't appear to have a wallet himself. The background music then changes to a guitar track, and cuts to the two of them driving on the road, drinking beers and cheering out of the window, with the sun still shining, further hinting of the upbeat and cheery atmosphere.
It's at this point that Matt starts talking about his past, whilst Martin listens, only half paying attention to the driving - he was sent to military school by his stepfather after he got into a fight with him, but ran off a few days ago to head to seattle to play music. He also shows martin the gap in his mouth where he lost a tooth. The background music then changes to diegetic music, coming from matt's guitar as he plays a tune. Martin's distraction causes him to run over something in the road, flattening one of the tires, causing them to stop in the road.
The next scene shows Martin apologising and Matt getting equipment to fix the tire. In the background the sun is gone and the sky is clouded over, darkening the atmosphere, and for the first time there is no non-diegetic background music. During this scene, whilst matt is preoccupied with the tire, Martin seems distracted again, looking behind them at the road and a car coming towards them. He doesn't warn Matt of the incoming car, but instead just stares at it, with an odd look in his eyes, not speaking and not really paying attention to Matt. His next piece of dialogue appears out of place and unimportant, but he says it as though it has a bigger meaning - "You and I are about the same height, Matt."
What happens next is incredibly sudden and so unexpected that it catches you off guard with incredible surprise. Just as the car is driving by, Martin shoves Matt into the path of the car, causing it to veer off the road and crash. The music begin to play a more menacing soundtrack, reminiscent of the style of Jaws and Psycho as Martin is shown with a look of excited shock on his face, seeming exhilarated, and stunned at the same time. He then approaches Matt, still barely alive, taking his ID and wallet, and seems to comfort him, telling him to be quiet. He then picks up a piece of concrete, and bashes Matt's face in.
The final scene shows Martin walking across a field, no longer wearing glasses, with a guitar and rucksack on his back. The background sound is menacing and dark, and the sky is still clouded over, and the surrounding area is darkening too. What makes it more menacing is that he is singing the same song that Matt was singing in the car. The scene then flashes out and starts the opening credits.

Psycho:

Genre: Suspense/Horror/Thriller
Main Actors: Janet Leigh, Anthony Perkins, John Gavin & Vera Miles
Release Date: June 16th 1960
Profit: £49,193,053
Description:
Following on from the theft of $40,000, motel secretary Marion Crane mysteriously disappears after running from her hometown with the money. Following an enquiry into her disappearance, her family is lead to a backwater motel owned by bachelor Norman Bates, but as more clues are found about Marion, a dark revelation about Norman's true nature begins to surface.
  

Opening Analysis:


This film, rather than having an opening scene to start, has the opening credits starting the film off. Uncharacteristic of a thriller, since a good few thrillers use the opening scenes to build up initial suspense and set an atmosphere before starting any opening credits, to add effect and emphasis to them. Instead the credits start without any prior suspenseful build up to emphasize them.
The credits themselves do not contain any imagery, just a black background with white text appearing and disappearing off of the screen, not unexpected, considering the film is monotone. The only editing used is the presence of solid grey lines streaking across the screen in orderly fashion, to clear the screen of any text or add different text to it. Some of the text also gets distorted during its time on screen, particularly the title, and the name of the producer, somewhat fitting considering that the film is called Psycho.
The non-diegetic music track used to accompany the credits, is done purely with string instruments, and, whilst not having the menacing feeling that creates the stomach turning feeling of tension, instead has the sharp, strong and quick sound associated with action and climaxes at the end of suspense build up. This again adds to how uncharacteristic of thrillers the opening credits are, since there has been no prior chance to create the suspense to make the opening music more weighted and moving to the viewer.
What the opening credits do do is, instead of being used as a way to end suspense build-up, instead provides a premonition of sorts, as to what the film is really going to be like, and to what to expect in the film's plot.
So it comes as a surprise when the credits finish, what the first scene shows. It begins with a panning shot showing a cityscape from what is evidently a high place, that looks out over a large view of the city. It's daytime, the sky is bright and the buildings themselves have a light colour to them. Several bars of text show up on the screen, revealing that the location is Phoenix, Arizona, the date is Friday 11th December, and the time is 2:43pm. Aside from the height of the view, nothing initially seems out of the ordinary or are there any signs of abnormality. The camera eventually begins to zoom in on one particular building, a multi story hotel, and then fades out to a view of one of the windows, where the window is open, and the blind is partially up. From the outside the view into the room is completely dark, until the camera physically moves through the gap and gradually the inside of the room is revealed.
The next scene in the room also doesn't follow the general conventions of a thriller film. The room has two people, a young and attractive woman, Marion, initially lying on the bed in nothing but her bra and underdress, and a handsome young man, Sam, with his shirt off standing at the edge of the bed. It is easy to assume what has just happened before the start of the story, and the relationship the two characters have.
As the scene continues they are shown having a conversation about the state of their relationship, Marion saying that they need to be more respectable and less secretive with their affections, with Sam agreeing as long as he can still see her. It is revealed that it is her lunch hour at the current time, and that she still needs to go to work. Their relationship seems to be strong, and positive by the way that they talk to each other, albeit not fully public, most likely due to the views of unmarried sex and intimacy in the 60s. The positive mood and the casualness and lack of danger in the scene really seems out of place for a thriller, where there always seems to be some feeling of danger, and none has revealed itself yet, even though the intro already suggested the nature of the story.
The conversation then shifts to Sam's own experience, stating that he is weary of having debts to pay off to various people, even though they are no longer around, and that he wants to still see Marion so that he can have something he doesn't mind working for. Marion says that they should get married. Sam jokes about it, saying that it's not the right time, and that it wouldn't work properly. Finally the scene ends with Marion leaving the room, saying she has to get back to work and that Sam has a plane to catch, before changing scenes to her workplace.



Inception:

Genre: Sci-Fi/Mystery/Thriller
Main Actors: Leonardo DiCaprio, Ken Watanabe, Ellen Page
Release Date: July 8th (UK)/16th (US) 2010
Profit: £665,532,764
Description: 
Dom Cobb, a thief who specialises in corporate espionage by infiltrating human sub-conscious minds, is tasked with performing a near impossible process known as 'inception' by japanese businessman Mr. Saito. His reward, anmesty from his crimes and a return to his normal life. That is if he manages to do it succesfully.

Opening Analysis: 


The film starts off strong, having powerful brass instruments playing a strong, emphatic soundtrack to accompany the start before the first scene even starts which gradually gets stronger and more dramatic - creating a build-up straight away. When it does start however, the brass instruments stop completely, and the only sound is the diegetic sound of ocean waves, as the first scene shows large white waves crashing against rocks, indicating that the location is on the coastline. The skylight is bright and radiant, and the sun is causing the water drops to shine. Considering the build-up from the music, it is a surprising way to culminate it, with a bright, somewhat surreal start to the film, although there is still a sense that something big will happen.
The camera then cuts to a close-up shot of the face of a man, wet through and seemingly alive, lying in the surf and looking in need of help, although no injuries can be seen. He only seems to be half conscious, or at the very least physically weak, since he seems to struggle even to lift his head to look around him.
The next shot seems to be from his point of view, and shows a pair of young children making sandcastles in the sand. It is not clear if the children are actually there, because the sound of their laughter isn't completely clear and has a spectral hint to it, indicating the laughter to be in his head; and, considering his condition, they could very possibly be an infringement of his imagination. Even so it strikes question as to what role they may have in the story and their connection to the man. As the scene progresses a more melancholy, and soothing soundtrack plays, that also has a spectral feel to it: another indication he may be hallucinating.
The camera then shows an asian man in black uniform and hat, poking his rifle into the man's jacket - a guard or soldier of some kind. He then lifts up the man's jacket with his rifle, revealing a gun half wedged inside the back of his trousers - an indication that the man isn't just an ordinary citizen, possibly a criminal or a government agent. The asian soldier then calls to another soldier (made apparent by him also having a rifle) in his own language, standing on a hill overlooking the ocean, with a large and distinguishable oriental styled building visible behind the man. The man then heads towards the building. Considering the building's size and the fact that there are soldiers patrolling its grounds is a clear indication that whoever owns the house has power, money, and importance.
The final scene is set inside the building, and initially shows the view of a room through a doorway, well lit by many lanterns on the ceiling, whilst the doorway itself is shrouded in darkness, and the visible figures are shadowy and all have their backs turned to the camera. What the men are saying is clearly understandable by subtitles at the bottom of the screen, and they seem to be talking to one man in particular, sitting in chair in the centre of the doorway and the camera's framing, indicating him to be  someone of importance. As the camera zooms in, through the doorway, he is shown in more detail. He is an elderly man, bald, wearing a black suit.
As the men speak to him they bring in the items that the man on the beach had on him: the gun in the man's trousers, and one other object, made clear by the camera cutting to it's placement on the table. It it shown to be an unremarkable metal gyro, but is given importance by the camera deliberately showing it. Indeed, its importance is highlighted again when the elderly man suddenly stops what he's doing and looks to his side as the man is dragged in by two others, not shown to be physically capable of walking himself.
As the man eats rather clumsily, and not paying particular attention to the elderly man as he speaks, the old man asks a rather straight question - "are you here to kill me?" at which the man stops eating and looks up slowly at the man sitting opposite him. The asian man then picks up the gyro, and starts it off spinning, stating that he recognises it, and that it belonged to a man he had met many years ago in a "half-remebered dream," indicating that not everything about him or the other man is completely ordinary. The last thing he says is that the man was "possessed of some radical notion," what notion he doesn't say, but the statement is enough for the other man to lift his head up fully, and reveal his face completely, indicating he understands what the man is talking about.

No Country for Old Men:

Genre: Western/Thriller
Main Actors: Tommy Lee Jones, Javier Bardem, Josh Brolin
Release Date: November 9th 2007
Profit: £146,627166
Description: 
When Texan welder Llewelyn Moss stumbles across $2,000,000 worth of drug money by chance, it triggers a sequence of fateful events that starts a deadly game of cat-and-mouse, and connects the stories of three men, as their crossing paths create an odyssey where not all of them come out alive.

Opening Analysis:


After the title appears on the screen, no sound except for the diegetic sound of howling wind can be heard, until a non-diegetic voice-over starts. It's a man with a strong and rough sounding western american accent to his voice. No other non-diegetic soundtrack can be heard at the start, literally nothing, just the background sounds of the film's setting. The absence of background sound is somewhat soothing, and allows the watcher to put more focus on the landscape and the person talking.

As the scene goes on, from his dialogue the man doing the voice-over is revealed to be a sheriff, like his two fore-fathers, is at least older than 25, and he seems to be talking about himself, his experiences, and his thoughts. Firstly about his feelings on being a sheriff at the same time as his father, saying he was proud of it.
As the man speaks the setting changes several times. The first shot being too dark to see anything except a multi coloured sky - dark blue lightening and changing to dark orange, seemingly before daybreak, and only the silhouette of the landscape - flat land with a visible high plateau in the centre of the camera's frame.
The next shots in sequence show various other parts of the land and how they look as the light gradually increases - the silhouettes of pylons, the sun rising up over the ridge of a hill and casting long rays into the camera, a vast prairie half in sunlight and half in shadow. The fact that the film utilizes the increasing light of daybreak to introduce the films environment and setting is unique and uncommon for a thriller, since with a thriller you half expect the light to be getting darker rather than lighter. The daybreak is appropriate since it represents new starts and new days - fitting since it is the start of the film.
During these pictures he then talks about the sheriffs of the past, how they never needed to carry guns, how he always took a chance to hear about them, how sheriffs nowadays would compare themselves to them and wonder how they would fare in the present time.
His next thought is from his own memory, of a man he apprehended because of him killing a teenage girl, not out of passion but simply because he had intended to kill someone all his life, and openly stated he would do it again and go to hell. He didn't know what to make of it.
During this third thought various structures are also shown, such as barbed wire and old, decrepit wind pylons, typically associated with western ranches or towns. The structures appear out of time and somewhat random since there is nothing else around them except barren prairie. It indicates that there is very little human life, and the little that there is is spaced out and out of touch from the world, an indication of how much human influence and importance there will be in the film.
That does change however, when the last shot of a fence pans around to reveal a police car, at the side of a tarmac road, and two men walking towards it, one a man wearing a beige shirt and trousers, a stereotypical western cowboy hat, and the star and badge of a deputy sheriff, the other a tall man with black hair, wearing black trousers and a black shirt, with his hands cuffed behind his back - clearly someone who's just been arrested by the deputy, and already indicating that there will be crime elements in the story. As the two get in the car, the handcuffed man's face is not revealed, since he has his back turned when he gets in, and his figure is shadowed when he is inside - an indication of him being a dark character, especially since his attire and hair are also black.
As this is happening on the screen the voice-over man talks now about his feelings about what his job entails in the current age. How crime has become more frequent and more alien, and that he is wary of going into it since whilst his job means he must be willing to die, he wishes to not become part of something he doesn't understand. This gives indication that this man, whoever he is, is alive, but whether he appears or plays a role in the film, is hinted and quite possible, but not completely definite.
His last dialogue as the car drives down a long road stretching out over the vast prairie ahead, is that to resolve crime nowadays "a man would have to put his soul on the line. He'd have to say 'ok, I'm gonna be a part of this world.'" This is also the only time that a faint non-diegetic sound can be heard in the background - a faint humming that emphasises the man's last words and that they play some role in what the film is about.  


Wikipedia Article on the film Taking Lives + location for movie poster image
Wikipedia Article on the film Psycho + loaction for movie poster image
Wikipedia Article on Inception + Movie Poster image location
Wikipedia Article on No Country for Old Men + movie poster location

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

The Thriller Continuity Video

Alright so now there is an overview of the genre, and now also some film examples and opening analysis'. What next you may ask? Well, now it seems it was time to put what I'd learnt to the test and produce something slightly more substantial than boring text and research. The answer, a video for the opening to a made-up Thriller, the idea courtesy of yours truly, with the heavy influence from some other great minds in my Media Class. 

What the film was about was left up to us, but the minimal requirements were that:

- The video had to be at least a minute long
- It had to include dialogue
- There had to be at least two people acting in it

I didn't exactly jump at the chance when I first heard about it. My experience with filming in the past was next to zero and it was initially hard for any good ideas to materialise in our heads for a good opening. Indeed this piece wasn't completed for a long time after after we were assigned it. Despite that it was ideal that there should be this 'continuity piece' on the blog as a kind of anchor, so continuity piece I did, and this post covers the planing and ideas stage, the completed piece and an evaluation afterwards. Enjoy.

Ideas Stage:

So to begin with I was doing what any person with a budding idea does, and that's create waypoints and put them in some kind of orderly state that can be made sense of. So to start off I created some basic plot functions that would be what the events of the opening revolved around. As said before these were initial thoughts but the outlines of the idea are bullet pointed underneath.
  • Obviously a Thriller, so needed to include some elements of what a Thriller film entailed - suspense, tension, build-up, plot twists, and a constant feeling of danger.
  • We decided early on that the sub-genre would be a classic crime thriller setting, or one that had supernatural elements to it, in this case possible murder.
  • In this case the victim would be a teenage boy walking his dog as the light is fading from the sky
Plot functions as to the feel for the story, and how the murder takes place are listed below. There were several ideas but not all of them were intended to be implemented. The ideas we had were:
  • As the boy goes to collect the dog lead after seeing the time he thinks he sees someone in the bushes of the house behind watching him, but when he looks out of the window nobody is there
  • The boy receives a note in his letterbox, containing his house key and a message within saying 'funny place to keep your key.'
  • After receiving the note and becoming spooked from it, the boy quickly gets his dog and hastens away from the house at a quick speed.
  • The setting then changes to a wood at very low light, and has the boy walking down a dirt track. He then allows his dog off the lead, only to have him run off into the dark wood and forcing the boy to go in after him. As the boy is searching he hears something from behind a tree. Cautiously approaching he gradually walks round and it is revealed to be the dog. Relieved the boy stoops down and re-leashes him only to stand up again and suddenly someone is standing behind him. As he turns round the last thing seen is a knife being brought down.
  • Alternatively he asks his father about the house behind and is told it's abandoned, and rumoured to have been so because of a mass murder there. As the boy leaves his dad is revealed to be staring after him menacingly.
  • Following from talking to his father and leaving the house, there is shown to be someone on the lane behind him following him, but each time the boy looks round nobody is there, as he keeps moving the figure gets closer until he is right behind him, the boy then turns round and the last thing heard is his scream.
In coming up with these ideas I also thought up two different title for each of the possible films. 

For the crime based one, with the note and the woods the title would be: 

THE CIRCUMSTANCES

For the supernatural themed trailer, with the conversation and the mysterious man I came up with the title:

The House Behind Ours

In the end, whilst both ideas were good, I could only go with one or the other. So in the end I chose to go with my second idea: The House Behind Ours, mainly because after doing some film testing in the woods it was made incredibly difficult to film in the kind of light I was after to make it effective. That and I hadn't thought of where any dialogue could be included in my other idea, so the other idea was easier, plus I could film within vicinity of a place that I had unlimited time in.

So with that decided it was now onto the development and creation of - The House Behind Ours

Development Stage:

This stage was the experimental stage, where flexibility was allowed. This section includes bits and pieces of miscellaneous things that didn't make the final cut for the movie. There are two things to look at here - the first being unedited shots of video footage from the other storyline for the crime thriller both in the house and in the woods, before I decided to go with the supernatural one; the other being a piece of screenplay for the supernatural Thriller (the rest of which will be covered in the creation stage) that was cut out of the final screenplay so as not to make the trailer too long, since it was only meant to last a couple of minutes, one minute minimum. (One thing I should mention. I do have footage of filming in the woods, but for some reason it won't upload, so we just have footage from the house as of the moment.)

Scrapped Video Footage:


























Scrapped Screenplay:


Scene then shifts to outside the house, back with the same shot from the start, showing Sam leave through the gateway and out onto the lane.
Shot then changes to a side shot further down the lane, of Sam walking by, then cutting to a closer shot of his face.The shot changes again to a view of the front of Sam's face, and now a dark figure is seen standing on the road behind him, with his head out of the camera's frame.

Sam then looks behind him abruptly, and the shot then shifts to a shot of further up the lane behind where the figure was. Sam stays still for a moment then turns his head around, and the shot switches back to the shot before, only with the dark figure standing much closer behind him, as Sam starts walking again.

The shot then changes to a shot of Sam appearing at the end of the lane, and another close up of the side of his face.

The shot then reverts back to the front of Sam's face, with the dark figure standing right behind him.
Final shot has the camera close in on Sam's head from behind until finally Sam glances behind and his face becomes shocked. The last thing heard is Sam's scream before the camera cuts to black screen





 Creation Stage:
Now this stage is where it finally came full circle as to the difficulty of the task at hand and I realised I hadn't set myself up well for it, hence why it took so long to make the video. To begin with I only had one other person working with me and it was never easy for him to get down and do filming. Then there was the problem of my available resources - No good quality video camera designed for the task, just the video function on an IPhone, no other cameras, and nothing to support them with. In short I had one camera to film with, every shot had to be handheld, and I was short on people to work it since both me and my partner were acting in the film.

For these reasons I realised rather late that I couldn't do the filming without some outside help, so I enlisted the help of my dad and my brother to help with the camera. Since I wanted the film to look good I decided that, with one camera, I would need to be clever in how I filmed and edited the film to make it look good. Speaking of which the editing was the one place that I found relief. Thanks to my computer I had access to the Apple editing software - iMovie, so the editing stage would not be an issue, and I had plenty of soundtracks to use for the editing process.

Thanks to filming tests that I had done beforehand I knew how the film could be shot, where the ideal shots would be, and how to make them work effectively in the location we were using. The next thing I did was write up a screenplay for the trailer, so that both I and the people working with me knew exactly what shots there would be and how the video would play out. I also created a movie poster using photos that I took during the filming. You can see the movie poster to the side here. The links to things on the poster that I didn't make myself are at the bottom of the post as usual.

The next stage that I did was to map out exactly how I wanted the trailer to run, what shots there would be and where, and what dialogue would be present, so to this end I hand crafted a screenplay detailing all of the necessary details, both to clear my head, and to show the others exactly how it would play out. The screenplay is down below, with some photos I took to better show how the shots would look. There is also a link up on the blog itself to a different page with just the screen play on it, without the images.

Thriller Continuity Video - Screenplay

Starting from a black screen there is a gradual fade-in showing an establishing shot of the location: a  lane sloping downwards with many houses either side. The light is low and a figure can be seen walking down the lane at the bottom, but the camera then begins to pan round to the left to show a large house with a big driveway, and two rows of low fence crossing over a path leading around the back of the house.

Shot then cuts to view from the back of the house, now on the other side of the two fences, with the driveway visible at the back of the shot. The camera then tilts/pans diagonally left, up to a window on the top floor.

Shot zooms into the window and fades out into a shot inside the room from where the window is, showing Sam taking off his shirt and picking up a white tank top on his chest of drawers. 

Shot cuts to a closer shot of Sam as he puts the top on then sits back on bed and glances behind him at his clock. 

Camera follows his glance and then cuts to a close-up picture of the clock, displaying the current time.

Shot quickly cuts to a shot from behind Sam's back, with the doorway to the room at the back of the shot. As he speaks he gets up, grabs his jacket and leaves the room.

Sam: No way (mouthed quickly). Alright, best get going. It'll be dark soon. 

Shot then changes to a shot of an open door, in a room on the ground floor, with a long window looking out into the back garden and a work desk beneath. Sam then enters and camera follows him to the other side of the room.

Shot then cuts to an outside view from the bushes in the garden, looking into the room that Sam is in.

Shot then cuts back to Sam with a dog lead in his hand, glancing out the window briefly, then looks out again straight away, thinking he saw something.

Shot changes to view from inside the room, looking out at the bushes, as if from Sam's point of view.

Shot changes to side shot of Sam looking out of the window. He then shakes his head and turns to walk out.

Shot changes to a shot from the outside bushes, showing Sam leave the room.

Starting shot following Sam through from the sitting room doorway and along down the small part of the hallway. Dad is sitting at the table, at the end looking towards the doorway. Cocoa is lying down on his bed dozing

Sam: Dad!?

Dad: Hello? (calling back in response to Sam)

Shot then switches to a still shot from over dad’s left shoulder as Sam comes and looks through the doorway. Then comes towards the camera holding the lead.


Sam: Oh you are there, hey

Dad: Hi Sam

Shot then changes to a diagonal shot of dad sitting at the table, as Sam walks past the camera to where cocoa is.

Sam: OK, You wanted me to walk him?

Shot changes to me in the frame standing by the chest of drawers, from head down to torso, as I lift the lead up to show the camera

Sam: So I’m walking him

Shot changes to a shot from against the work surface looking at both Sam and Dad in near full of the camera’s frame.

Dad: Excellent

Sam: Don’t expect me to be out long though. It’s not like it’s something I enjoy doing. Besides have you seen the time? It’ll be dark before I know it. C’mon Cocoa!

Dad:  OK see you later!

Shot changes to in the hallway at head height. The table is still visible as Sam comes towards the camera. Sam stops and looks back.

Sam: Hey Dad, question.

Shot-reverse shots of Sam’s and Dad’s faces, gradually getting closer to Dad’s face at each piece of dialogue.

Dad: What? (camera on dad)

Sam: That house behind ours, the one surrounded by overgrown bushes. (camera on Sam, low angle so looking diagonally up at him) Who lives there?

Dad: That house is abandoned. (camera on dad) Has been for a few years. That’s why it’s overgrown.  (camera on Sam) It was like that when we moved here.

Sam: Anyone know why it was abandoned? (side shot of Sam’s face from kitchen side of door frame)

Dad: (camera on Dad) I don’t know Sam. (camera then changes to dad’s close up face from a side angle) People say it was a mass murder, during a house party, but the sources aren’t reliable. (camera then changes to normal and zooms out) Why do you ask? (camera on Sam)

Sam: Uh. No particular reason. Just wondering. C’mon cocoa.

Shot then changes back to a shot from behind dad, with his head around the side of the frame, showing Sam leaving the house.

Final shot is from the outside as Sam shuts the door, showing dad slowly taking off his glasses and then the door shuts, then the shot fades to black.

The Video:



With the screenplay done and the shots being taken, the only thing left was the editing of the film. Since it was also my first time using iMovie, it was a good excuse to take a look at my available options, and the amount of flexibility I had with editing. One thing I forgot to mention at the start of this post is that the video doesn't get marked, but it's meant to demonstrate your understanding of camera shots and how to use them effectively; but since there is another video to be created later that does get marked, this project enabled me to test my filming capabilities and what I had to work with. The piece didn't require much editing, just some lighting changes to make it seem darker, some volume adjustment to make the dialogue easier to distinguish, some shot trimming and some non-diegetic soundtracks to back-up the action. Then just convert to quicktime, submit to youtube, and download. So without further ado, I present to you my completed Thriller continuity video: 

The House Behind Ours -

Designed, Directed and Produced by Sam Thompson and Forrest Sherwin

Actors:

Sam Thompson
Forrest Sherwin
Richard Thompson

Cameramen:

Sam Thompson
Forrest Sherwin
Richard Thompson
Joseph Thompson
Carol Thompson (Development Shots)

Software for Editing:

iMovie for iMac (Edited by Sam Thompson)

Music:

In the Future - Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Sky Soundtrack - Arata Iiyoshi
Planet's Paralysis - Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Sky Soundtrack - Arata Iiyoshi
Fortune Ravine Depths - Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Explorers of Sky Soundtrack - Arata Iiyoshi


The Evaluation Stage:

So we get onto the final stage of this post. This will be a self evaluation, not really following any set questions, so it may be a bit unorganised. Where to start. 

Well to begin with, considering in the end it was just me from my class working on this, I was filming with an I phone, and I'd never done filming in the past, I would say that I'm incredibly pleased with how this film turned out. It certainly fit the criteria - 2 mins, 21 secs is not too long a time scale and certainly over a minute, there was definitely dialogue included, and there was more than one actor involved. The film also experimented with camera angles, different shots, the use of diegetic and non-diegetic sound, and the effectiveness of dialogue; all of which are used effectively enough in the film, and show a variety of different experimentation which I can use to my advantage in the future for my second video.

I can't judge very well how good it was at incorporating elements of Thrillers, since I'm so used to seeing it through creation, plus creation kind of takes away the crucial elements of a plot, since you always know what will happen. I know that I certainly tried to implement the elements into the video. Feedback from people who have seen it says that I does, but not overly strongly.


There are definitely many things that I would improve on the video if given the chance. I think that the wasn't any problems with the editing, but having one camera made it very difficult to work efficiently, so in the future I would definitely use more than one camera for filming like this. 
The next thing that I would want to improve is visual quality and camera movement. An IPhone isn't the most ideal thing to film with, and has a degree of unprofessionalism to it, and since I had no other equipment like a tripod at my disposal I had to rely on steadiness of hand for panning, tilting, and tracking shots, and also had to use still shots far more frequently to make the filming easier; so definitely come with proper filming equipment in the future to ensure the best camera quality. 
Finally there was the problem of the number of people working on it. At the start there were three people working on it, but that went down to one by the end of the creation. I can only credit the work of one of the other people in my group in the creation of this film, and even then more than 3/4 of the work done towards the videos was left up to me, hence why I had to enlist my family to help out a great deal. It was a reliable way to work, but again an unprofessional way of going about it, so I want to be able to have more people, specifically from my Media class to help me in the future.

To conclude, as far as I'm concerned, from the view of a creator looking at his finished work, I do like how it turned out, but that is maybe because I compare the finished piece to the bare bones of it, before it was put together, which I know is something that people who are reading this post can't see. By itself, in my opinion, for an amateur effort with no previous experience it is a very good piece of work.

Tuesday, 15 January 2013

Film Classification and the BBFC



So we finally have a proper substantial piece of work to, at the very least, show off. We are definitely past the half way point of the work into completing this study on Thrillers. There are just a few more things to get done before saying we are finished. This is our next research piece. This time we are covering film classification.

This piece of research doesn't specifically relate to Thrillers; instead it covers every film released in cinemas and on DVD. I'll be enlightening you on a classifying system that you will almost definitely recognise if you watch films (which I'm fairly certain you do), as well as the organisation that supplies them.

I'm going to cover two different questions in this research piece, and answer them for you, hopefully in a useful way. So here we have our possible final piece of research for this strand of the media. Enjoy and discover!

1. What is the BBFC?

"The British Board of Film Classification is an independent, non-governmental body which has classified cinema films since it was set up in 1912 and videos/ DVDs since the Video Recordings Act was passed in 1984." Quote from the BBFC's official website

This here is the organisation that I was referring to at the start. This is the company that is primarily responsible for film classification even existing in the first place. 

The BBFC is an acronym for The British Board of Film Classification. This organisation has been around since back in 1912 when it, back then called the British Board of Film Censoring, was created by the film industry to assist councils across Britain with the organisation of classification of cinema films. Whilst making the job of classification far easier, the council's view still superseded theirs, and the final decisions on film ratings still belonged to councils.

The BBFC itself is a solely independent organisation, meaning they don't have any ties whatsoever to any other company, including both the government and the film industry that first set them up. They also do not seek profit for their work, only charging the necessary money fees to cover the costs of their work.

This kept up until 1984 when a document called 'The Video Recordings Act' was passed by the government. What this act basically entailed was that all DVDs, as well as films, that were put on sale or given for hire had to be first classified by selected authority. It was here that the President and Vice President of the BBFC were designated to be this authority and the organisation's name was changed to what it is currently known as.

Since then the BBFC has been responsible for classifying every film that has ever made it onto the big screen or been burned onto a disc. Indeed DVD film that you've bought in your life (unless it's been pirated) has probably been classified by the BBFC.

2. What is Film Classification and how are Films Classified?

Ok, technically I was lying. It is in fact three questions that I'm answering, but these two are similar to each other so it's better to cover them in the same question. Either way...

As for how the films are classified by the BBFC.
Put in very simple terms, Film Classification is a means of rating and grouping movies and other media into set brackets, for how suitable they are for the audiences watching. The brackets are based more on age, and the running time of the film, as opposed to film genre.

As to the way the BBFC classifies films, the company itself has a set of guidelines for classification that are used when evaluating. The process varies for films and DVDs. Both have their classifications decided by examiners. For films released in cinemas there are at least two examiners that evaluate the film, for DVDs normally only one, seeing as most films that become DVDs have already been released in cinema, and thus been already evaluated.

As I said before, the BBFC has set guidelines for film classification but since this is my own words I just have some basic guidelines as to how examiners classify films. The detailed guidelines, if you want them, can be found on the BBFC website but in shorter, more digestible terms, the examiners make the decision for the classification based off of factors in the film such as:
- The tone and impact of the film
- The film's genre
- Ethnicity
- Sexual content and nudity
- Profanity and drugs
- Violence and horrific content

There are a total of 5 major film classifications that I'm certain you recognise from film posters, DVD cases and advertisements. Each suitability rating corresponds to certain age brackets, getting more restricted as you keep going. They are, in order:

U - Universal -
All ages (above age 4)

This rating is the most widely varied in terms of audience. The U certificate is the lowest age rating applied to films, and as such is used on the safest films content wise. U films are either absent of any dark theme, or if they do the themes are filtered and softened to be lighthearted and cheery.

That doesn't mean U films are aimed specifically at young audiences. There are several U films that are aimed at adults but classed as U because of their content still being suitable for all ages.

For this reason things like drug references are omitted unless the film includes things relating to anti-drugs. Violence and danger are filtered and softened down to be lighthearted and humourous. Only the very mildest profanity is present and the only references to sex and intimacy are things such as hugging and kissing.

Often films classed as U include some sense of meaning, or have life lessons implemented into their plots. Since U films are primarilly what children watch, since they are too young to be allowed to watch high rated films, they often have a positive feel and, as I've already said, often contain life lessons for the young audiences to take in and learn.

PG - Parental Guidance -
All ages but young audiences require parent consideration before they can watch.

One of only two certificates with age ratings that have exceptions to them.
PG is still aimed at yound audiences, but looks more into adult themes than U dos, and has more films that are more suitable for adults. These films are suitable for independent viewing past age 8.

Unlike U films, PG films do explore into darker themes such as violence, drugs and sexual intimacy, just provided the film portrays in in an appropriate way and isn't upsetting to younger audiences.

PG films allow more leniance when talking about certain topics. Elements such as violence and sexual intimacy are allowed provided it is mild and doesn't go into detail, such as visible blood but nothing visible of the injury. Drugs are allowed to be refernced as long as they aren't strong plot elements, and mild profanity is allowed as long as it's used properly and minimally.

The issue with PGs is waryness of plot elements, stunts or pieces of the plot that young children may be tempted to copy. For this reason any elements that are dangerous for children to copy are ommitted from PGs to minimize the risk, and any weapons present in PGs aren't glamourised in any shape or way.


12A & 12 - Ages 12 or Higher -
Ages 12 and above, but in the case of 12As they can be viewed by younger adiences if accompanied by an adult. The 12A certificate is only used for cinema releases while 12 is only used for DVDs.


This is the only other certificate that allows exceptions to it's age rating, or at least in the case of 12A. These films are unsuitable for very young audiences due to them moving more towards the adult spectrum.

How films get a 12 or 12A rating is vastly more dependant of the film's tone as well as its content, and the this is often the determining factor as to whether films become 12s/12As or 15s in a higher bracket, especially if the tone is dark.

Action sequences and fight scenes are far more present in this bracket, along with injury and occasional gore, provided the latter is justified in one way or another. It's also in this bracket that the mildest horror films are included.

12s/12As permit more visible intimacy and mild nudity in the films provided it isn't frequent, and the same goes for profanity, allowing for infrequent use of strong language. Drugs and dangerous behaviour are also present but neither element is glamourised or put in a positive light. racism and discrimination is still omitted.



15 - Ages 15 or Higher -

Although 15s may seem to be not that different from 12s/12As, there is in fact quite a considerable difference in allowed content. 15s are far more lenient with suitable content than the previous certificate/s and veer completely away from audiences below the teenage years, being more focused on adults.

To make this difference apparent, a single 15 rated movie can have one or several of the following: Frequent strong language, numerous sexual references as well as sexual violence and uncensored nudity, strong violence and use of drugs, and discriminatory behavior or language.

15s do have their limitations however. Whilst there isn't a limit on use of strong language, there is on  the strongest phrases and overuse isn't permitted. Discrimination, sexism and racism are allowed but not to be encouraged. Sexual content doesn't contain any boundaries, unless it goes into great detail; violence is allowed but extreme gory scenes, as well as sadistic or sexualised violence isn't permitted in a 15; and drug use is permitted but not allowed to be encouraged.

There is also the risk of copyable elements of the films, particularly for teenagers, that are dangerous in real life. As a side note, this age certificate is also where you'll find the majority of your horror films.


18 - Ages 18 or Higher -

This is the highest rating that can be given to any film released, and is also the strictest viewing wise. 18 rated films are not allowed to be viewed at cinemas or bought/rented by anyone under age 18, period. They are are fully aimed towards adults.

Since adults are deemed responsible for what they choose to view, there is no prohibition on 18s as to what they contain. That means anything goes: any form of violence or horror and the presence of blood and gore, no limitation on profanity or drug use, sexual violence, strong sexual references and occasionally real sex, as well as no limitation on discrimination.

The only possible limitations that an 18 rated film are elements that can have an impact on society. things like glamorisation of weapons, drugs, violence or, elements that may make immoral or unethical issues such as discrimination or segregation, rape or suicide look appealing, or where the material in the film is in violation of the law.

There is also one other higher certificate that doesn't really count as a major film rating and that is R18

R18 is a legally restricted classification that is only ever applied to films where sex is a revolving plot element. Any 18 films with detailed or unjustified forms of sex are classed as R18. R18s are specifically designed to be used for sexual arousal and can only be viewed at licensed cinemas and can only be bought in sex shops. For good reason this rating is kept away from public search online, and is never shown in public cinemas.


The website for the British Board of Film Classification + Where I obtained the images from